Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract:Model compression techniques such as quantization and pruning are widely used to reduce the deployment cost of large language models (LLMs), with existing evaluations focusing almost exclusively on accuracy preservation. However, in safety-critical applications, a model's ability to reliably quantify its own uncertainty is equally important. We ask: does compression preserve this ability? To answer this question, we benchmark 12 LLMs under various compression configurations across five NLP tasks, using conformal prediction to provide a rigorous, distribution-free measure of uncertainty. Our experiments reveal that: (I) compression frequently decouples accuracy from uncertainty; (II) larger models absorb compression-induced uncertainty far more effectively than smaller ones; and (III) uncertainty inflation is often threshold-like rather than gradual. These results suggest that accuracy-only evaluation is insufficient for assessing the deployment readiness of compressed LLMs, and that uncertainty-aware benchmarking should be a standard component of model compression pipelines.
Abstract:Recent work has demonstrated the potential of contrastive steering for jailbreaking Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods rely on limited and inherently biased contrastive prompts and require laborious manual tuning of steering strength, limiting their robustness and effectiveness. In this paper, we leverage the idea of model extraction to guide the learned steering vectors to approximate the ideal one and propose tuning the steering strength adaptively based on contrastive activations' statistics. Experiments demonstrate that our method notably improves the effectiveness and robustness of probe-based steering, without any extra contrastive prompts or laborious manual tuning. Being an attack paper, this paper focuses on revealing the breakdown of fortified LLMs, raising the average harmfulness score from 6\% to 70\%. Our code is available at https://github.com/fhdnskfbeuv/adaptiveSteering.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown remarkable ability in aligning visual and textual representations, enabling a wide range of multimodal applications. However, their large-scale training data inevitably raises concerns about privacy, copyright, and undesirable content, creating a strong need for machine unlearning. While existing studies mainly focus on single-shot unlearning, practical VLM deployment often involves sequential removal requests over time, giving rise to continual machine unlearning. In this work, we make the first attempt to study continual unlearning for VLMs and identify three key challenges in this setting: effectiveness in removing target knowledge, fidelity in preserving retained model utility, and persistence in preventing knowledge re-emergence under sequential updates. To address these challenges, we propose CATA, a conflict-averse task arithmetic method that represents each forget request as an unlearning task vector. By maintaining historical task vectors and performing sign-aware conflict-averse aggregation, CATA suppresses conflicting update components that may weaken previous forgetting effects. Extensive experiments under both single-shot and continual settings show that CATA outperforms baselines in terms of forgetting effectiveness, model fidelity, and forgetting persistence.
Abstract:Machine unlearning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is typically performed at the image or instance level, making it difficult to precisely remove target knowledge without affecting unrelated semantics. This issue is especially pronounced since a single image often contains multiple entangled concepts, including both target concepts to be forgotten and contextual information that should be preserved. In this paper, we propose an interpretable concept-level unlearning framework for VLMs, which constructs a compact task-specific concept vocabulary from the forgetting set using a multimodal large language model. In addition to modality alignment, visual representations are decomposed into sparse, nonnegative combinations of semantic concepts, providing an explicit interface for fine-grained knowledge manipulation. Based on this decomposition, our method formulates unlearning as concept-level optimization, where target concepts are selectively suppressed while intra-instance non-target semantics and global cross-modal knowledge are preserved. Extensive experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain forgetting settings demonstrate that our method enables more comprehensive target forgetting, better preserves non-target knowledge within the same image, and maintains competitive model utility compared with existing VLM unlearning methods.
Abstract:In the realm of multi-objective alignment for large language models, balancing disparate human preferences often manifests as a zero-sum conflict. Specifically, the intrinsic tension between competing goals dictates that aggressively optimizing for one metric (e.g., helpfulness) frequently incurs a substantial penalty on another (e.g., harmlessness). While prior work mainly focuses on data selection, parameter merging, or algorithmic balancing during training, these approaches merely force compromises between divergent preferences along a fixed Pareto frontier, failing to fundamentally resolve the inherent trade-off. In this work, we approach this problem from a novel perspective of multi-dimensional rewards. By scaling up the model's rollouts and analyzing the outputs across different reward dimensions, we arrive at a critical conclusion: the conflict among multiple objectives stems from the fact that the prompt itself inherently restricts the achievable multi-dimensional rewards. Based on this core observation, we propose MORA: Multi-Objective Reward Assimilation. Specifically, MORA isolates single-reward prompts through pre-sampling and expands their reward diversity by rewriting the original questions to incorporate multi-dimensional intents. Extensive experiments demonstrate that: (1) in sequential alignment, MORA achieves single-preference improvements ranging from 5% to 12.4%, with exceptional gains in harmlessness, after multiple-preference alignment across helpful, harmless, and truthful dimensions. (2) In simultaneous alignment, MORA achieves an average overall reward improvement of 4.6%. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Shiying-Huang/MORA-MPA.
Abstract:Conventional gait de-identification methods often encounter an inherent trade-off: they either provide insufficient identity suppression or introduce spatiotemporal distortions that impede structure-sensitive downstream applications. We propose GaitProtector, an impersonation-driven gait de-identification framework that formulates privacy protection as a unified objective with two tightly coupled components: (i) obfuscation, which repels the protected gait from the source identity, and (ii) impersonation, which attracts it toward a selected target identity. The target identity serves as a semantic anchor that biases optimization toward structurally plausible gait patterns under the pretrained diffusion prior, helping preserve dominant body shape and motion dynamics. We instantiate this idea through a training-free diffusion latent optimization pipeline. Instead of retraining a generator for each dataset, we invert each input silhouette sequence into the latent trajectory of a pretrained 3D video diffusion model and iteratively optimize latent codes with a differentiable adversarial objective to synthesize protected gaits. Experiments on the CASIA-B dataset show that GaitProtector achieves a 56.7% impersonation success rate under black-box gait recognition and reduces Rank-1 identification accuracy from 89.6% to 15.0%, while maintaining favorable visual and temporal quality. We further evaluate downstream utility on the Scoliosis1K dataset, where diagnostic accuracy decreases only from 91.4% to 74.2%. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to leverage pretrained 3D diffusion priors in a training-free manner for silhouette-based gait de-identification.
Abstract:Although many complex models were proposed to analyze time series data, some studies have demonstrated remarkable performance with simpler structures. A recent study proposed a non-parametric framework for 3D point cloud classification, which has the potential to be adapted for time series forecasting and enable interpretability. Inspired by the previous works, we present TSNN, a non-parametric and interpretable framework for traffic time series forecasting. TSNN consists of multiple layers that decouple the time series by matching the entries in a memory bank, where the memory bank is constructed using a similar matching process within the training set. It leverages the periodicity in traffic data to enhance forecasting accuracy while maintaining a simple model architecture. The proposed model operates without trainable parameters, preserving its inherent interpretability. In the experiments, TSNN achieves competitive performance compared to the typical deep learning models in four real-world traffic flow datasets. We also visualize the decoupling process to show the effectiveness of the components. Finally, we demonstrate the interpretability of the model and illustrate the contribution of each time step within the memory bank.
Abstract:Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can perform zero-shot classification but are susceptible to adversarial attacks. While robust fine-tuning improves their robustness, existing approaches align fixed text embeddings with an image embedding, sacrificing natural performance and robustness. A robustness degradation also occurs when a model faces adversarial attacks targeting superclasses (parent classes, e.g., mammal) in addition to their base (leaf) classes (e.g., cat). Thus, to enhance adversarial robustness and leverage the inherent hierarchical properties of class space, we propose a novel adversarial fine-tuning framework based on hierarchical embeddings and several levels of adversarially robust alignment of image-text modalities. Additional mechanisms place visual embeddings at the desired depth of hierarchy, and we provide a theoretical connection between the depth of embedding in the hierarchy and the maximum viable margin size. Our model naturally realizes several margin sizes, boosting generalization of adversaries for robustification. As various trees with different parent labels can share the same leaf labels, we also consider aligning over multiple trees to boost semantic variety. Experiments across several datasets are performed.
Abstract:Open-vocabulary Object Detection (OVOD) enables models to recognize objects beyond predefined categories, but existing approaches remain limited in practical deployment. On the one hand, multimodal designs often incur substantial computational overhead due to their reliance on text encoders at inference time. On the other hand, tightly coupled training objectives introduce a trade-off between closed-set detection accuracy and open-world generalization. Thus, we propose Decoupled Cognition DETR (DeCo-DETR), a vision-centric framework that addresses these challenges through a unified decoupling paradigm. Instead of depending on online text encoding, DeCo-DETR constructs a hierarchical semantic prototype space from region-level descriptions generated by pre-trained LVLMs and aligned via CLIP, enabling efficient and reusable semantic representation. Building upon this representation, the framework further disentangles semantic reasoning from localization through a decoupled training strategy, which separates alignment and detection into parallel optimization streams. Extensive experiments on standard OVOD benchmarks demonstrate that DeCo-DETR achieves competitive zero-shot detection performance while significantly improving inference efficiency. These results highlight the effectiveness of decoupling semantic cognition from detection, offering a practical direction for scalable OVOD systems.
Abstract:Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) greatly expand LLMs' multimodal capabilities but also introduce cross-modal safety risks. However, a systematic understanding of vulnerabilities in omni-modal interactions remains lacking. To bridge this gap, we establish a modality-semantics decoupling principle and construct the AdvBench-Omni dataset, which reveals a significant vulnerability in OLLMs. Mechanistic analysis uncovers a Mid-layer Dissolution phenomenon driven by refusal vector magnitude shrinkage, alongside the existence of a modal-invariant pure refusal direction. Inspired by these insights, we extract a golden refusal vector using Singular Value Decomposition and propose OmniSteer, which utilizes lightweight adapters to modulate intervention intensity adaptively. Extensive experiments show that our method not only increases the Refusal Success Rate against harmful inputs from 69.9% to 91.2%, but also effectively preserves the general capabilities across all modalities. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zhrli324/omni-safety-research.